This idea is not yet agreed. At its first meeting, the Forum agreed that the leopard corridor concept goes to the Transformasie Komitee in writing before anything else is done [MS]. None of the other organisations named on this page have been approached. They include the Cape Leopard Trust, the Landmark Foundation, CapeNature, the Greyton Conservation Society, Wild Restoration, the Greyton Tourism Bureau, Wesgro, the Overberg District Municipality, and Theewaterskloof Municipality. Please do not share this page publicly yet. The idea will be tabled at a Forum meeting once the Komitee has responded.

What the letters in square brackets mean

Facts on this page are followed by a tag that shows where they come from.

  • [IC] Independently Corroborated. Confirmed by at least two sources that do not depend on each other, or by an official record.
  • [MS] Mission-Sourced. Comes from the people putting this idea forward, or from the organisation the sentence names, in their own documents or statements. It has not been checked against other sources.
  • [TBV] To Be Verified. Seems likely, but nobody has confirmed it yet.

Statements without a tag are proposals. They describe what the idea could become.

The goal

By 2038, visitors come to the valley to walk where leopards live, and what they spend pays local guides and the science that keeps leopards and farms safe.

Why the valley needs it

Leopards live in the valley’s mountains. Wild Restoration’s trail cameras have recorded leopard, genet, bushpig, and klipspringer at its clearing sites in the Riviersonderend mountains [MS]. The people putting this idea forward say the Landmark Foundation runs leopard cameras in the Greyton Nature Reserve and the Genadendal mountains [MS]. Much of the mountain land is protected. CapeNature’s Riviersonderend Complex covers about 28,580 hectares, including Vrolijkheid Nature Reserve [IC]. The Greyton Nature Reserve covers about 2,200 hectares [MS]. CapeNature’s plan for the Complex names the klipspringer as a sign that its habitat is connected [IC].

Leopards are few and spread thin. Researchers who surveyed about 3,500 square kilometres of the Overberg with 86 pairs of cameras identified 25 adult leopards, or about 0.64 leopards for every 100 square kilometres [MS]. The Cape Leopard Trust surveyed the Boland mountains, to the west of the valley, from May to September 2025. Its cameras photographed leopards at 72% of 90 stations, and it identified 38 individual leopards [MS]. In country like this, visitors would seldom see a leopard.

Nobody is counting leopards in the valley’s own mountains. The Boland survey ran from Bainskloof south to the Kogelberg coast [MS]. The Overberg study worked mainly in the lowlands and along the coast, including De Hoop [MS]. A search for this page found no published survey of the mountains between Villiersdorp, Genadendal, and Riviersonderend, which lie between those two areas [TBV]. The Valley of Grace BioHub lists an Overberg-wide camera network as something that does not exist yet [MS]. So nobody can yet say how leopards move through the valley.

Corridors depend on landowners. The 2023 Overberg study describes the Cape Fold Mountains as a natural corridor for leopards, and recommends building corridors in partnership with private landowners [MS]. Where leopards take sheep or goats, some are killed. A landowner has written that a male leopard collared by the Landmark Foundation in 2014 was later caught in a trap and shot by a farmer near the Rooihoogte pass [TBV]. The Landmark Foundation says it catches and collars leopards blamed for livestock losses before releasing them, and pays farmers compensation linked to collared leopards [MS].

Who visits the Overberg today. Wesgro, the province’s tourism agency, collected 7,588 survey responses from visitors at Overberg tourism offices in 2024. About three in four were South African, and nine in ten of those came from the Western Cape [IC]. Germany, the United Kingdom, and the Netherlands sent the most overseas visitors [IC]. About 10% of visitors named outdoor activities as what they did, and about 8% named heritage sites [IC].

What the province is funding. The Western Cape Tourism Growth Fund aims to help double international arrivals to the province by 2030 [IC]. It gives preference to projects outside the metro and in underserved areas, and its priority themes include village heritage and Western Cape trails [IC]. Wesgro’s five-year plan describes the provincial target as doubling tourism by 2035 [MS].

What the Forum asked for. At its first meeting, the Forum made conservation and environment one of its five priorities, and discussed a possible Overberg leopard corridor [MS].

The idea

The idea is a destination management plan: a shared plan for how visitors come to a place, what they do there, and how the place and its people gain from them. This one would be built around the Cape leopard and the mountains it lives in.

Visitors would come for the signs leopards leave (tracks, scratch marks, and droppings), for camera trap pictures, and for the people who study them. Seeing a leopard would be a rare bonus. The plan would never promise one.

Start in the valley’s own mountains

Planning material for the Overberg divides it into four parts [MS]. The valley sits in the northern part, which runs from Villiersdorp through Greyton to Riviersonderend [MS]. The plan would start there, where the gap in leopard monitoring lies, and could later take in the Langeberg mountains to the north.

What the valley could do itself

  1. Bring people together. Convene landowners, guides, tourism businesses, and researchers in the northern Overberg around one plan.
  2. Join leopards and heritage. Link the leopard story to Genadendal’s mission heritage and to the proposed Valley of Grace Heritage Trail, which already names a Cape leopard corridor as one of its two conservation stories [MS].
  3. Close the monitoring gap. Ask the Cape Leopard Trust, the Landmark Foundation, and CapeNature to plan a camera trap survey of the valley’s mountains that links the Boland and south coast data, with young people from the valley trained to service the cameras.

What others would hold

A plan for the whole Overberg would need bodies with legal standing behind it. Marketing the region would stay with Wesgro and the local tourism offices. Roads, land use, and municipal budgets would stay with the Overberg District Municipality and the four local municipalities, which could adopt parts of the plan in their integrated development plans. Reserves and their trails would stay with CapeNature and the reserves’ custodians.

What visitors could do

ExperienceWhat is there todayWhat the plan would add
Mountain trailsCapeNature publishes a map and brochure for the Boesmanskloof trail between McGregor and Greyton [IC]. The Greyton Conservation Society maintains trails in the Greyton Nature Reserve [MS].Guided walks that read leopard signs along the way.
Camera trap walksThe Cape Leopard Trust gave 42 lessons to more than 1,800 learners during its 2025 survey [MS].Walks with researchers and trained local guides to check cameras and see what they caught.
Clearing daysThe Greyton Conservation Society runs a monthly alien hack, and Wild Restoration takes volunteers [MS].Clearing days sold as part of a stay, with the story of what clearing does for leopard habitat and water.
Recording natureThe Valley of Grace Nature Realm went live in July 2026 and covers about 10,000 hectares [MS].Visitors log tracks and sightings, with exact places hidden.
HeritageThe Genadendal Mission Museum. The Heritage Trail proposes training heritage guides and heritage home hosts [MS].Stays that join a mountain walk with a day in Genadendal.

Rules the plan would set

  • No baiting, and no calling leopards.
  • Camera locations are never published, and pictures are shared only after a delay.
  • Group sizes are set with CapeNature for each trail.
  • Trails close on days of high fire risk, in step with the Greyton Volunteer Firefighters and CapeNature.
  • A plan with farmers for any leopard that takes livestock is agreed before any marketing starts.

Longer stays

A day visitor from Cape Town spends little in the valley. The plan would build two- and three-night stays that join mountain trails with heritage and local food, so that more of what visitors spend stays with guides, hosts, and growers in the villages.

Leopards and water

The same mountains feed the Riviersonderend. Crews who clear invasive pines to give more water to the river, as proposed in Restoring the River, would also be restoring the land leopards and their prey live on. They could check cameras on the same trips.

Who would benefit

  • Young people from every village, trained as nature guides and camera technicians.
  • Heritage home hosts and guesthouses, from visitors who stay overnight.
  • Farmers, who would have a say in the plan and a route to help when leopards take livestock.
  • Learners, through camera trap projects and records on the Nature Realm.
  • Leopards, from better knowledge of where they move and fewer killed in conflict.

Who would pay

Nothing has been costed, including a camera survey of the valley’s mountains [MS]. Money could come from several places:

  • The Tourism Growth Fund. It has R7 million for 2026/27 and takes applications until the money runs out [IC]. Applicants must have been operating for at least two years [IC]. See the Heritage Trail application for the valley’s current request.
  • Conservation funders. Funders of leopard research could pay for a camera survey of the valley’s mountains.
  • Visitors themselves. A share of each guided walk or stay could go to a fund for monitoring and for the villages. A 2026 news report says that more than 190 families in Ladakh, India, earn an income by hosting visitors in snow leopard country, which helps make up for livestock lost to predators [TBV].
  • Water funds. Where crews clear for water and leopards at once, water funders could pay for the clearing.

Who would decide

  • The Transformasie Komitee, first, for anything on Farm 39 land: trails, camera sites, and homestays.
  • Landowners, for what happens on their land. Cameras would go on private land only by agreement.
  • CapeNature, for its reserves and state forest, under its management plans.
  • Heritage Western Cape, for any work inside the Genadendal heritage precinct.
  • The researchers, for the camera data they collect. Any sharing would be by written agreement.
  • The municipalities, for any part of the plan that needs roads, land use, or public money.
  • The Forum, for whether the valley takes on the job of convening the plan.

How it fits the Forum’s goal

The Forum’s long-term goal plans a BioConomy that keeps more of what the valley has in the valley. This idea would turn the valley’s mountains and their leopards into work for local people, and use part of what visitors spend to look after both.

It follows the three values of the long-term goal:

  • Cooperation (economic). Guides, hosts, landowners, and researchers work to one plan.
  • Equality (civic). Every village has a route into the work, and the Komitee decides on Farm 39 land.
  • Freedom (cultural). The valley tells its own story of its mountains and its heritage.

It serves four of the Forum’s priorities: Tourism Development, Education and Skills, Conservation and Environment, and Business Development and Local Procurement.

What is still open

  • The Komitee’s view. Whether the written concept has reached the Transformasie Komitee, and what it thinks of trails, cameras, and homestays on Farm 39 land.
  • Leopards in the valley’s mountains. Who holds the camera data from the Greyton Nature Reserve. Whether the Cape Leopard Trust, the Landmark Foundation, or CapeNature would survey the gap, and what it would cost. None has been asked.
  • Farmers. What farmers in the valley think of a leopard plan, and which farmers’ bodies should be asked.
  • Who would hold the plan. Which body with legal standing would adopt a plan for the Overberg, and whether the Overberg District Municipality, Theewaterskloof Municipality, or Wesgro would take part. None has been asked.
  • Who would convene it in the valley. Which organisation would do the work, and whether it meets the Tourism Growth Fund’s two-year rule.
  • Visitor numbers. How many visitors stay overnight in the valley, and for how long. Wesgro does not publish these figures for each municipality.
  • Cape Town. Whether visitors to the Overberg shorten their stay in Cape Town. No figures exist.
  • How many visitors the villages can take. Limits for each village and trail, set with residents.
  • The Nature Realm. How visitor records would keep leopard locations hidden.
  • The name. Planning material uses several names for the same idea. The Forum may choose one.

What happens next

  1. The written concept goes to the Transformasie Komitee, as the Forum agreed, and the Komitee’s response is added to this page.
  2. The Cape Leopard Trust, the Landmark Foundation, CapeNature, the Greyton Conservation Society, Wild Restoration, and farmers in the valley are asked for their views.
  3. The idea is tabled at a Forum meeting once the Komitee has responded.
  4. If the Forum agrees, a plan for the northern Overberg is scoped. The Valley of Grace BioHub lists December 2026 for starting this work [MS].
  5. A costed camera survey of the valley’s mountains is planned with researchers for 2027.

Have your say

Contact the moderators via How to Submit, or come to the next Forum meeting.

References

On leopards in the Overberg:

On the valley’s mountains:

On visitors and funding:

Elsewhere:

On the idea:

  • Valley of Grace BioHub. Heritage and Tourism. The Leopard Corridor Destination Management Plan as its proposers describe it, and the December 2026 start for scoping.
  • Valley of Grace BioHub. Biodiversity Data. The gap in an Overberg-wide camera network.